Tag Archives: thor

Blu-ray Deal: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase One: Avengers Assembled Box Set

Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase One - Avengers Assembled Blu-ray Box Set

As part of Amazon’s Cyber Monday deals today, the special limited edition Marvel Cinematic Universe – Phase One: Avengers Assembled 10-disc, 6-movie Blu-ray Collector’s Edition box set is on sale for only $99.99(that’s 54% off the list price of $219.00).

The Marvel Cinematic Universe – Phase One: Avengers AssembledBlu-ray box set contains the movies Iron ManIron Man 2The Incredible HulkCaptain America: The First Avenger, and Thor, as well as “The Phase One Archives” bonus disc, all housed in collectible packaging with exclusive memorabilia.

Visit the main CYBER MONDAY DEALS page for more sales!

 

And grab this box set now while it’s on sale through the end of the day.

Marvel Cinematic Universe – Phase One: Avengers Assembled

– Marvel’s The Avengers (Blu-ray 3D and Blu-ray)
– Captain America: The First Avenger (Blu-ray 3D and Blu-ray)
– Thor (Blu-ray 3D and Blu-ray)
– Iron Man 2 (Blu-ray)
– The Incredible Hulk (Blu-ray)
– Iron Man (Blu-ray)
– Bonus Disc – “The Phase One Archives” (Blu-ray)
– Collectible packaging with exclusive memorabilia from the Marvel Cinematic Universe

 

The post Blu-ray Deal: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase One: Avengers Assembled Box Set appeared first on Geeks of Doom.

Why Marvel Studios Succeeds (And How It Will Fail If It Doesn’t Diversify)

 

Guardians Of The Galaxy just enjoyed a very successful weekend at movie theaters, taking home around $94m, far in excess of expectations. The movie also stands at 92% positive reviews on aggregator site Rotten Tomatoes, joining all previous Marvel Studios movies in receiving predominantly favorable notices.

Marvel Studios is doing very well. In six years and ten movies, it has avoided both critical and commercial disasters, and frustrated naysayers who hailed the demise of the superhero movie at every step. Marvel’s rivals at FoxSony/Columbia, and Warner Bros, have enjoyed commercial success as well — but not with the acclaim, consistency, or proliferation of Marvel. So how does Marvel do it, and can they keep doing it?

I think the secret to Marvel’s success owes much to necessity. Marvel simply can’t afford to screw up the superhero movie business, because it’s the only business the studio is in. That sounds like a circular argument — it succeeds because it can’t fail — but I think Marvel’s singular focus forces it to be smart, ambitious, and innovative in ways that its rivals are slow to understand. Marvel Studios succeeds because it goes all-in.

Look at Marvel’s competitors and it becomes clear that superhero movies are not their sole priority. Fox has its Fantastic Four reboot and its X-Men franchise, but it makes plenty of other movies, including other franchises — Assassin’s Creed, Ice Age, Planet Of The Apes, Taken, etc. Sony/Columbia wants to build a universe around Spider-Man with Sinister Six, Venom, and perhaps Black Cat or Spider-Woman, but it also has the James Bond franchise, Jump Street, The Smurfs. DC’s parent company Warner Bros. is a beast, and it didn’t just make the Dark Knight movies; it also had Harry Potter, The Hobbit, The Hangover, and much more, including the new Godzilla. There are people at Warner Bros. who never have to think about Batman.

There is no-one at Marvel Studios who doesn’t have to think about Captain America.

 

 

Marvel Studios, of course, is not a studio on the scale of Warner Bros. or Fox. It’s a subsidiary of Disney, which also makes Disney-branded movies like Frozen and Tangled, Pixar movies, Muppet movies, Pirates of the Caribbean movies, and now Star Wars movies. But Marvel Studios appears to be — and by all accounts is — largely autonomous. It operates its own brand, and it puts out two movies a year under that brand — moving up to three in 2017. All of those movies are essentially one interconnected super-franchise.

That makes Marvel very unusual. Liam Neeson’s character in Taken does not have to worry about his daughter being kidnapped by Caesar from Planet Of The Apes. James Bond is not going to take down Gargamel in the next Smurfs movie. But every Marvel movie has implications for the others, in-universe and out. Any stumble or sign of weakness has ramifications across the line. If the superhero movie renaissance were to fail apocalyptically, Marvel Studios would shutter its doors, because even if it makes a space movie or a magic movie, they’re all part of the same superhero franchise. Marvel doesn’t have anything else. Even its horror comics are superhero comics. Even Patsy Walker is Hellcat.

Marvel needs its superhero movies to succeed, and to keep succeeding. The studio cannot afford to go fallow. It cannot afford to take its heroes off the screen for a few years while the audience recovers its interest. It cannot afford to burn its audience out.

For that reason, the studio maintains rigorous standards that seem designed to please as wide an audience as possible. Marvel strives to satisfy its core fan base while also entertaining general movie-goers. It doesn’t pander to one section of the audience — for example, young white men, or Americans — in ways that alienate other sections of the audience — like women, or overseas viewers. Marvel tries to stay fresh by mixing superheroes with other flavors — fantasy, espionage, space opera. The studio created a franchise that is just episodic enough to build anticipation, build audience, and build brand loyalty between movies, but also sliced up into sub-franchises that won’t overwhelm audiences or leave anyone behind. These strategies have helped Marvel establish a trustworthy brand and lure increasing numbers to take a chance on its pictures.

 

 

Moving from two movies a year to three is going to be a big risk for the studio, because it brings the risk of wearing the audience down — but the expansion is both natural growth and a consequence of Marvel’s success.

This is where success can be dangerous. Marvel is very tied to its existing franchises, and I don’t think it expected to create as many successes as it has. Remember that Iron Man and The Incredible Hulk came out the same year. Even then, Marvel was laying the groundwork for its shared universe and its ambitious Avengers plans (in a way that the studio could easily walk away from if it all went south).

Iron Man did very well and became a franchise. Incredible Hulk did less well, and the franchise stalled at one movie. (The earlier Ang Lee Hulk was not a Marvel Studios picture.) Both characters ended up in Avengers anyway, but Hulk/Bruce Banner was recast.

It’s easy to imagine that if Thor or Captain America had not met expectations, they too would have stalled at one movie, even if they both ended up in Avengers. This is how Marvel adapts to failure — or even under-performance. Failure is mixed back into the pot. Success is nurtured and rewarded. It all looks organic and unforced. So, Captain America: The Winter Soldier was a critical and commercial hit, and its sequel is scheduled for 2016. Thor: The Dark World didn’t jump as high or earn as much acclaim, so it’s back-burnered. It probably will get a sequel, but it’s not on the calendar yet — not the public one, anyway.

I don’t think Marvel was counting on Iron Man and Thor and Captain America all being as successful as they were. I think Marvel had contingencies in place in case any of them failed.

Similarly, I imagine this year’s Guardians of the Galaxy, next year’s Ant-Man, and the year after’s Doctor Strange, are all properties that could be their own three-movie franchises — but they could just as easily stop at one movie apiece. Marvel already greenlit a sequel for Guardians based on advance buzz; it could have nudged that sequel off the schedule if the movie had bombed.

Now imagine if Marvel still had the rights to Spider-Man and X-Men. It seems unlikely that we’d be watching a Guardians movie in 2014. Of the ten movies Marvel has released, three would have been Spider-Man, and at least two would have been X-Men. Maybe we’d have got to one Hulk and two Iron Mans, maybe a Captain America and a Fantastic Four. Guardians Of The Galaxy wouldn’t even be on the “maybe” list.

 

 

Not having those brands is part of what forced Marvel to take risks — and really, all of their movies are bigger risks than Spider-Man or X-Men. That’s why those movies got made first — just at other studios.

Not having the big names compelled Marvel to created a screenwriting hothouse to develop script treatments for lesser known properties, and Guardians Of The Galaxy emerged from that project. It might as easily have been Black Panther or Captain Marvel, or, who knows, Power Pack, or Sleepwalker, or Darkhold: Pages From The Book Of Sin.

This is the weird contradiction of Marvel Studios; it is both controlling and risk-taking. It can’t play safe like Sony, Fox, and Warner Bros, because it doesn’t have their more iconic licenses — although the nature of those icons is being redefined in real time by Marvel Studios’ success. But Spider-Man is Spider-Man and Rocket Raccoon is Rocket Raccoon, and that means Marvel cannot settle into the comfortable familiarity of making each movie a faded copy of the last success, whether in sequel, spin-off, or reboot format. It can’t cavalierly disregard the source material and risk alienating the only people who already care about its weird fringes. It can’t stick to a single grim or adolescent tone that predominantly appeals to one (big) audience segment. Those are conservative instincts that come from not wanting to ruin a “sure thing” like Spider-Man. Marvel can’t be conservative if it wants to make audiences love Star-Lord the way they love Spidey.

But Guardians is Marvel’s first movie with an all-new cast since 2011, and Marvel needs to establish new franchises like this as a precaution against old franchises failing. Thus far, Marvel sequels always outperform their predecessors worldwide. At some point diminishing returns must set in, and Marvel wants to be able to isolate any rot so that other branches can flourish, rather than let the whole tree — their whole business — die.

The problem is that the success of existing franchises doesn’t leave a lot of room in Marvel’s schedule for new franchises, even when the studio movies up to three pictures a year. Here’s what the schedule looks like:

May 1st 2015: Avengers: Age of Ultron
July 17th 2015: Ant-Man

May 6th, 2016: Captain America 3
July 8th, 2016: Doctor Strange (unconfirmed)

May 5th, 2017: Unknown, possibly Thor 3
July 28th, 2017: Guardians of the Galaxy 2
November 3rd 2017: Unknown

May 4th, 2018: Unknown
July 6th, 2018: Unknown
November 2nd, 2018: Unknown

Counting Avengers as its own franchise, Marvel launched five franchises with its first ten movies, and only the Iron Man franchise isn’t certain of another sequel. If Ant-Man and Doctor Strange repeat the success of Marvel’s previous properties, those might be the only franchises it launches among the next ten movies. One could well imagine a calendar that looks like this:

May 1st 2015: Avengers: Age of Ultron
July 17th 2015: Ant-Man

May 6th, 2016: Captain America 3
July 8th, 2016: Doctor Strange

May 5th, 2017: Thor 3
July 28th, 2017: Guardians of the Galaxy 2
November 3rd 2017: Iron Man 4

May 4th, 2018: Avengers 3
July 6th, 2018: Ant-Man 2
November 2nd, 2018: Doctor Strange 2

Would this be a problem? Yes, if the old franchises start to wilt and Marvel doesn’t have any new franchises set up to take their place. And the risk of old franchises wilting seems exacerbated by rapid changes in audience profiles and audience appetites.

African-Americans and Asian Americans are more enthusiastic moviegoers than white American audiences. Hispanic audiences account for 20% or more of opening weekend ticket sales for blockbuster movies in the U.S. Women account for 52% of the moviegoing audience, and major releases with female leads keep upsetting expectations — like Scarlet Johanssen’s Lucy, which smashed Dwayne Johnson’s Hercules at the box office. On top of all that, the international audience for movies is more important than ever before, with almost 70% of studio revenues coming from foreign markets.

Disney is clearly switched on about all of this, and it’s easy to see that understanding reflected in the decision to cast black actors John Boyega and Lupita Nyong’o in key roles in the next Star Wars movie, and Gwendoline Christie in a role reportedly written for a man. That all goes some way to addressing the sci-fi franchise’s historic shortage of women and people of color. It’s also evident in the decision to adapt Marvel’s Big Hero 6 with a diverse cast — though sadly at the expense of several Asian characters. It’s notable that Disney Animation, rather than Marvel Studios, saw the potential in that property, and the feature carries no Marvel branding whatsoever.

 

 

This appreciation for a changing audience isn’t limited to movies. One only need look at another Disney subsidiary to see the importance Disney attaches to female and non-white audiences.

Disney’s ABC television network is launching three sitcoms this fall with minority casts, as well as the first sitcom to feature an Asian American as the romantic lead (Selfie). ABC has given a whole night of primetime programming to a black woman, writer/producer Shonda Rimes, with two of her three hours led by black female leads. Dramas with female leads have done very well for the network — with Once Upon A Time and Scandal as standout examples — and all the successful dramas launched by ABC in the last couple of years have featured black leading characters except Nashville and Marvel’s Agents of SHIELD.

Even ABC Family, once known as an evangelical Christian network, has weirdly become home to some of the most inclusive shows on television, like the queer-friendly Pretty Little Liars and The Fosters.

Come to that, another Disney-owned company has made impressive strides with diversity in just the past year, launching its highest ever number of series with female leads and people of color, and integrating significant LGBT content into its output. That company is of course Marvel. Marvel Comics, that is; not Marvel Studios.

I don’t know if all of this is the result of a Disney-wide initiative to improve diversity within its output, or if it’s simply writers and commissioning editors taking advantage of the fact that the changing market means less resistance at the top. I suspect it’s a little of both. What’s clear is that Marvel Studios has not taken advantage of that change with the same rapidity. It hasn’t anticipated that change, and it hasn’t left itself in a position to quickly adapt to that change.

 

 

Marvel Studios has made strides in acknowledging diversity, putting female heroes and heroes of color on the screen in productions that didn’t require their presence. Sif, Black Widow, Heimdall, War Machine, Falcon, Gamora, Peggy Carter; these are all great characters. Marvel Studios’ own television division is giving a spotlight to Peggy Carter, Luke Cage and Jessica Jones. Rumors abound that Captain Marvel will cameo in Avengers: Age of Ultron (unfortunately under the “Ms. Marvel” moniker, and possibly not played by Katee Sackhoff).

But none of these characters has their own movie, and looking at the upcoming schedule, it’s easy to imagine that we won’t see a movie with a female or non-white lead until 2019. The earliest available slot is three years away.

If Marvel wants to be in a position to take advantage of changing audience appetites today, it should have announced a Black Widow movie at San Diego Comic-Con two years ago, when it announced Guardians Of The Galaxy. Marvel didn’t even announce that movie this year, or a Captain Marvel movie, or a Black Panther movie. Instead it announced Guardians Of The Galaxy 2.

A studio that once looked bold and risk-taking is now in danger of looking conservative and cautious, weighed down by its own success — just like Warner Bros., Fox, and Sony. Except, of course, Sony is reportedly planning a superhero movie with a female lead for 2017. Even if Marvel now does likewise, it’s going to look like it’s following Sony’s lead.

On the subject of a movie with a female lead, Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige recently said to CBR; “I hope we do it sooner rather than later.” He is the president of Marvel Studios. He doesn’t have to hope that they do it. He has to do it.

 

 

As for a movie with a non-white lead; if Marvel makes Thor 3 before it makes Black Panther, it will have made ten movies headlined by blond white men named Chris before it makes one movie headlined by someone who isn’t even white. (They can cast a black actor named Chris. That’s totally OK.)

They could of course circumvent that is if they cast a non-white actor as Doctor Strange, but no-one really expects that to happen — and therein lies the problem. Marvel now looks like it’s lagging behind audience expectations. That’s bad for a brand that built itself on giving audiences what they want. I don’t think the female Thor or the black Captain America in the comics are part of the solution either. We’ve been assured those ideas came from the comics’ writers. The movies can follow suit, but these story initiatives aren’t part of a stated Marvel Studios agenda.

I do think that heroes like Captain Marvel and Black Panther are part of Marvel Studios’ agenda — and I’m sure several factors conspired to keep those characters from our screens. Marvel’s unprecedented success is chief among them. It’s plausible that Black Panther or Captain Marvel is the very next name on Marvel’s “to do” list.

But maybe we have to wait for another franchise to fail, or for another slot to open up in 2019 or beyond, before Marvel gets that far down the list. And that simply isn’t good enough. Audiences want to see these heroes now, and if Marvel won’t provide them, maybe audiences will turn to Sony, or Fox, or Warner Bros, for the next phase of innovative superhero movie-making.

The secret of Marvel’s success is that it took risks in order to grow. The danger of Marvel’s success is that it may stop taking risks just when it really needs to.

Read More: Why Marvel Studios Succeeds (And How It Might Fail) | http://comicsalliance.com/marvel-studios-success-marvel-movies-diversity/?trackback=tsmclip

What will be the plot of Thor 3? by Joe Solomon

 

 

What will be the plot of Thor 3?

NEMGwAABWMb4QQ_1_1

 With the lackluster Thor: The Dark World finally out on DVD, Thor fans can start looking ahead to what challenges the God of Thunder will have to face in his next self titled movie.  Christ Hemsworth has already said he wants Thor 3 to feature his character as more of a powerhouse, so that means we are probably going to see Thor go up against even bigger and badder enemies than frost giants and dark elves.  What The Dark World so sorely lacked was emotion and a sense of seriousness.  The only heart wrenching part of the film is when his mother dies, other than that, the movie is a series of predictable Loki plot twists and reliable saving the girl techniques.  Joss Whedon has said Avengers: Age of Ultron is going to be pretty dark, so Thor 3 will hopefully take on that tone since it will be a post AOU movie.  With Odin missing it is not too far off to guess that Ragnarok, the end of the world, might soon be approaching.  It would be nice to see an “End of the World” scenario where Thor and his allies have to risk all to save everything that ever was.  So obviously Surtur seems to be a good choice for the big villain here.  Ladies (and men) can get their fill of Tom Hiddleston, as I’m sure Loki has a stake in keeping the universe intact.  And if the movie is long enough (it better be if it’s about the world ending) we might even be treated to Thor getting help from an unlikely source.

406px-Beta_ray_bill

BETA RAY BILL!  Am I biased? Yes. Beta Ray Bill is so badass his initials literally tell you he doesn’t have time for you.  Is it a stretch? I don’t think so.  The movie could easily start off with Beta Ray Bill’s flight from the forces of Surtur, and crash landing on Earth.  Marvel movies need to take a step away from single title movies past 2 or 3.  It’s obviously worked as of now, but Marvel single movies now seem like they are just bridging space between Avengers movies.  Instead of calling the movie “Thor 3: Generic Threatening Title”, they should call it “Ragnarok” or some other title from a comic storyline.  Thor would headline it still obviously, but there would be wiggle room to include other characters from other films.  Obviously Marvel and Disney don’t care, because they’ll be raking in the bajillions of dollars no matter what, but it’s an idea to think about.  I have better odds of getting a Booster Gold movie in my lifetime.  But a boy can dream.  I’m expecting big things from “Thor 3: Generic Threatening Title”, but I hope it’s not just LETS PUT HIM AGAINST THE ENCHANTRESS AND WE’LL CONNECT ANOTHER INFINITY GEM TEE HEE HEE. C’mon Marvel/Disney, don’t be that guy.              

Here’s Tom Hiddleston Cosplaying As Captain America In An Unused ‘Thor: The Dark World’ Scene [Video]

Thor The Dark World Loki Captain America Costume
Marvel Studios

If Tumblr was a person, they’d be flipping their lid right now.

If you caught Thor: The Dark World in theaters a few months back, you know there’s a scene in which Loki, played by Tom Hiddleston, briefly transforms into Chris Evans’ Captain America. It’s a funny scene.

For filmmaking purposes we’re not entirely privy to, other than maybe Hiddleston just wanted to wear a Captain America costume, the scene was originally shot with Loki’s actor rather than Steve Rogers’.  So get ready, Tumblr. You’re about to see some magic.

 

What’s especially weird is that Loki turns into Jaimie Alexander’s Sif in the clip, just like he does in the movie. Maybe Tom Hiddleston can just do that.

Thor: The Dark World hits Blu-ray and DVD  February 24. This outtake, along with presumably many others, and a short film featuring Iron Man 3‘s Ben Kingsley, will be part of the package.

Sif Set To Appear On Agents Of SHIELD

[Via Empire]

Read More: Loki Goes Captain America In Cut Thor: The Dark World Scene | http://comicsalliance.com/thor-the-dark-world-bonus-scene-loki-captain-america-cosplay-video/?trackback=tsmclip

Thor’s Lady Sif To Guest Star On Marvel’s ‘Agents Of S.H.I.E.L.D.’

Thor Lady Sif Jaimie Alexander

Finally, Lady Sif will be dropping by to visit Midgard!

Marvel has confirmed that Jaimie Alexander would reprise her role as the fearless female warrior in a special guest appearance in an upcoming episode of the ABC series Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.. Alexander appeared as the character in both Thor feature films, Thor and Thor: The Dark World […]

The post Thor’s Lady Sif To Guest Star On Marvel’s ‘Agents Of S.H.I.E.L.D.’ appeared first on Geeks of Doom.

Thor: The Dark World Review

 

 

natalie-portman-4-thor_GB

To start my review I wanted to say that I will not mention any spoilers in the film but talk more about characters individually and how it fits in Marvel’s Phase Two.

As we all know Thor: The Dark World is the second film in Marvel’s Phase Two, with the first being Iron Man 3. I didn’t want to moan about Iron Man 3 but I will say that despite being disappointed with the start of the second Phase this film definitely brought my Marvel expectations up high again. Even though both Iron Man and Thor include a lot of humour and action in their films for me I enjoy the wonder and fantasy of Thor’s world more than Iron Man. That might make me biased but hey!

Let’s get straight to Loki. Some people have been concerned that with Loki’s success as a villain that his character would push Thor aside in his own movie, I had this worry myself. The amount of Loki time was perfect. He was in the film enough on his own as well as with Thor. The balance was great. I think Loki in this film was better than in the previous two. They made him fun and mischievous and childlike which underneath everything is what he is. He doesn’t steal the show as much as you might have thought but he brings such a good part to the film, mainly due to his relationship with Thor. Despite everything that has happened in the past with the two on screen they have never actually been seen as two siblings acting like siblings. Marvel made it very fun and relatable to the audience. They also explain and carry on from The Avengers. Big thumbs up. Tom Hiddleston just is so good in this role, no faults what so ever with his performance. He carries it well and so he should he doesn’t know it will be his last time playing him.

Chris Hemsworth carries on playing Thor as a God, a hero and as a man who has grown from his experiences. The storyline does connect him with the Avengers and in this film it seemed they weren’t scared about talking about it too much. It made it flow from the Avengers which reminded the audience that despite everything that happens in the film, Thor is now an avenger. Thumbs up.

Let’s move on to Jane Foster, she is great in this film. Strangely there seems to be a lot more of her away from Thor than with him. She doesn’t need to be with him in this film, she’s not just a supporting character which was very refreshing to watch. However, when she does meet with Thor again you do see their relationship blossom, not as much as I hoped though. They don’t really get time to before things start happening. I’ll obviously not go into that.

Odin King of Asgard… Hmmmm. I just didn’t feel Anthony Hopkins as Odin this time. Not too sure why, he carries the character well it just seems like he didn’t have the same emotions and empathy as he did in the first. Rene Russo returns to play Frigga, Thor and Loki’s mother. She brings across such a typical loving mother as she did in the first. She interacts with Loki after he is returned to Asgard, I will say it is a very emotional moment in the film.

Malekith, is a typical alien nutjob who wants to cause destruction and chaos and doesn’t care who stands in his way. I thought Christopher Eccelston did a fantastic job being a baddy. Even though you could hardly tell it was him with all the fantastic make-up they used.

Two more three who I have to mention, Kat Dennings as Darcy has a lot more involvement in this film than I thought but in a good way. Dr. Erik Selvig, All I can say is he made everyone in the cinema burst out laughing. Any Edris Alba fans? He is great in it too. I know I keep saying great a lot but that’s what it is.

There’s rumours and questions as to if they have included an avenger in the film. Obviously I won’t say yes or no as it would give it away. The story continues straight after The Avengers which makes it easier for fans to follow and it explains so much about Thor and the Avengers team up. The make-up and CGI is also stunning, the visual representation of Thor’s world in this film does take you to a fantasy. 3-D for me is an iffy area but I would recommend it with this film. As long as you have a good distance for your glasses. Oh by the way the ending makes you want more even after a long film. The end-credit introduces someone you wouldn’t ever guess.

The main things I took away from this film was that Thor and Loki’s relationship stole the film, Jane Foster was not just Thor’s love interest, it explained so much about the past films and the humour which I thought at first was a bit too much but once my critic style mind had relaxed I laughed and I enjoyed the film even more than Thor. Definitely go see this film, best film I’ve seen this year. Sorry Superman.

MARVEL STUDIOS TO MARK THE TURNING BACK OF THE CLOCKS WITH AN EXCLUSIVE UK FAN SCREENING OF THOR THE DARK WORLD

 

 

thorj

MARVEL STUDIOS TO MARK THE TURNING BACK OF THE CLOCKS WITH AN EXCLUSIVE UK FAN SCREENING OF THOR THE DARK WORLD

To celebrate the release of the latest blockbuster adventure from the ‘Mighty Avenger’, THOR THE DARK WORLD, Marvel and Walt Disney Studios are marking the return of darkness to the UK by hosting an exclusive first look screening of the film as the clocks go back in the early hours of Sunday October 27th, giving fans the first chance to see the film ahead of its UK release on October 30th 2013.

Taking place in Greenwich, the epicentre of GMT and key filming location in THOR THE DARK WORLD the film will be screened exclusively to fans who will get the chance to win tickets via Marvel UK’s social channels and exclusive competitions.

Fans will be treated to a midnight reception in the magnificent Painted Hall at the Old Royal Naval College – a key location used within the film – before being some of the first in the UK to see the new movie from Marvel Studios, the creators of this year’s blockbuster sensation, Iron Man 3 and one of the biggest films of all time, Marvel’s Avengers Assemble. The film will begin at 1am – the exact moment that clocks around the UK are turned back one hour plunging UK nights back into darkness.

THOR: THE DARK WORLD continues the big screen adventures of Thor, the Mighty Avenger, as he battles to save Earth and all the Nine Realms from a shadowy enemy that pre-dates the universe itself. In the aftermath of Marvel’s Thor and Marvel’s Avengers Assemble, Thor fights to restore order across the cosmos…but an ancient race led by the vengeful Malekith returns to plunge the universe back into darkness. Faced with an enemy that even Odin and Asgard cannot withstand, Thor must embark on his most perilous and personal journey yet, one that will reunite him with Jane Foster and force him to sacrifice everything to save us all.

The Old Royal Naval College in Greenwich, setting of a major battle scene in THOR THE DARK WORLD, is one of London’s most iconic sites. The stunning Painted Hall, which took its artist almost 20 years to complete, is the jewel in its crown. Fans not lucky enough to win tickets to this exclusive event can still visit Sir Christopher Wren’s masterpiece to see where the scenes were filmed as it is open to the public daily.

 

THOR THE DARK WORLD IS RELEASED IN CINEMAS ACROSS THE UK AND IRELAND FROM OCTOBER 30TH 2013

 

For further information please contact:

Adam Merrett ǀ Way To Blue

0207 749 8457 ǀadam.merrett@waytoblue.com 

THOR: THE DARK WORLD – German Poster of Loki says Thor: The Dark Kingdom

75213

Check out the new poster released for THOR: THE DARK WORLD of a very sinister Loki holding a dagger in his hand. Did you guys notice that the title is named THOR: THE DARK KINGDOM? This could just bit because of the German translation but it might not be… Hmmm…

Marvel’s “Thor: The Dark World” continues the big-screen adventures of Thor, the Mighty Avenger, as he battles to save Earth and all the Nine Realms from a shadowy enemy that predates the universe itself. In the aftermath of Marvel’s “Thor” and “Marvel’s The Avengers,” Thor fights to restore order across the cosmos…but an ancient race led by the vengeful Malekith returns to plunge the universe back into darkness. Faced with an enemy that even Odin and Asgard cannot withstand, Thor must embark on his most perilous and personal journey yet, one that will reunite him with Jane Foster and force him to sacrifice everything to save us all.

LIKE, SHARE on facebook and twitter using the links to the right of the post and leave a COMMENT below

THOR: THE DARK WORLD – Two New Empire Magazine Covers have been revealed

thor

Two new THOR: THE DARK WORLD Empire Magazine covers have been released. Marvel have definitely gone with the Loki & Thor relationship for the advertising, it’s no surprise, Tom Hiddleston is the most loved villain in a film since Heath Ledger was Joker.

Check out the two covers below

Marvel’s “Thor: The Dark World” continues the big-screen adventures of Thor, the Mighty Avenger, as he battles to save Earth and all the Nine Realms from a shadowy enemy that predates the universe itself.  In the aftermath of Marvel’s “Thor” and “Marvel’s The Avengers,” Thor fights to restore order across the cosmos…but an ancient race led by the vengeful Malekith returns to plunge the universe back into darkness.  Faced with an enemy that even Odin and Asgard cannot withstand, Thor must embark on his most perilous and personal journey yet, one that will reunite him with Jane Foster and force him to sacrifice everything to save us all.

Click to enlarge

1184856_10151785868022708_460769011_n

1184884_10151785868027708_426585701_n

LIKE, SHARE on facebooka dn twitter using the links to the right of the post and leave a COMMENT below

THOR: THE DARK WORLD- New Poster and Full Synopsis released

THURS_003B_G_ENG-GB_70x100.indd

THOR: THE DARK WORLD (inDigital 3D and RealD)

MARVEL STUDIOS

Marvel’s “Thor: The Dark World” continues the big-screen adventures of Thor, the Mighty Avenger, as he battles to save Earth and all the Nine Realms from a shadowy enemy that predates the universe itself.  In the aftermath of Marvel’s “Thor” and “Marvel’s The Avengers,” Thor fights to restore order across the cosmos…but an ancient race led by the vengeful Malekith returns to plunge the universe back into darkness.  Faced with an enemy that even Odin and Asgard cannot withstand, Thor must embark on his most perilous and personal journey yet, one that will reunite him with Jane Foster and force him to sacrifice everything to save us all.

Starring Chris Hemsworth, Natalie Portman, Tom Hiddleston, Stellan Skarsgård, Idris Elba, Christopher Eccleston, Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje, Kat Dennings, Ray Stevenson, Zachary Levi, Tadanobu Asano and Jaimie Alexander with Rene Russo and Anthony Hopkins as Odin, Marvel’s “Thor: The Dark World” is directed by Alan Taylor, produced by Kevin Feige, from a story by Don Payne and screenplay by Christopher Yost and Christopher Markus & Stephen McFeely and is based on Marvel’s classic Super Hero Thor, who first appeared in the comic book “Journey into Mystery “ #83 in August, 1962.

“Thor: The Dark World” is presented by Marvel Studios. The executive producers are Alan Fine, Nigel Gostelow, Stan Lee, Louis D’Esposito, Victoria Alonso and Craig Kyle. The film releases in the UK on October 30, 2013, and is distributed by Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures.

Starring Chris Hemsworth, Natalie Portman, Tom Hiddleston, Stellan Skarsgård, Idris Elba, Christopher Eccleston, Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje, Kat Dennings, Ray Stevenson, Zachary Levi,

Tadanobu Asano, Jaimie Alexander with Rene Russo and Anthony Hopkins as Odin

THURS_003B_G_ENG-GB_70x100.indd

Sorry but doesn’t anyone else see that the new THOR: THE DARK WORLD poster looks exactly like the IRON MAN 3 poster?

COMMENT below

Plugin from the creators ofBrindes Personalizados :: More at PlulzWordpress Plugins